Thursday, 3/26/2026 p.m.

  • Stocks close sharply lower as oil prices rise – U.S. equities were notably weaker today, with the Nasdaq leading the decline at about -2.4%, compared with roughly -1.7% for the S&P 500 and -1.0% for the Dow. The move lower was driven by a renewed rise in oil prices and worsening sentiment around Middle East negotiations, as mixed signals on a possible ceasefire and tougher rhetoric toward Iran revived concerns about supply disruption, inflation pressure, and a longer period of policy caution. Treasury yields moved higher alongside that shift in sentiment, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising about 0.1% to 4.43%, reflecting reduced optimism on de-escalation and lingering inflation worries. Abroad, global equity markets also reflected a more defensive tone, with Europe’s Stoxx 600 closing 1.2% lower, while Asian markets were mixed overnight as investors weighed the same geopolitical and energy-related risks. Stepping back, the broader backdrop still suggests an oil-driven shock that is likely to be growth-negative and inflation-positive, but not necessarily a repeat of past energy crises given a less oil-intensive economy and relatively solid underlying fundamentals. Overall, volatility may remain elevated in the near term, but if energy prices eventually stabilize, we think the larger picture still points to modest slowing rather than a deeper downturn, with resilience in the underlying economy helping to cushion markets over time.
     
  • Why this is not a 1970s-style energy crisis – While the Iran conflict has created a major oil shock, today’s backdrop is fundamentally different from the one that produced the stagflation of the 1970s for several reasons. Energy is a smaller drag on consumers than it used to be — energy spending as a share of total consumer spending is materially lower than it was during the 1970s and early 1980s (roughly 2% today versus about 6% then), suggesting that the direct hit to household purchasing power from a given oil shock is smaller today. The U.S. is far more insulated on the supply side — The U.S. has been a net exporter of oil since 2019, and domestic natural-gas prices have remained relatively insulated from the disruption, even as Europe and Asia face a supply crunch. U.S. shale producers stand to benefit from higher prices, even if that support does not fully offset the drag from weaker consumer spending. Oil still matters, but less in a services-based economy — large oil-price moves still hurt, but the global economy is less oil-intensive than it was during the original energy crisis. Since 1950, the amount of energy required to produce one unit of GDP has fallen by roughly 70%, reflecting efficiency gains and the growing importance of the services sector.
     
  • Broadening leadership a key theme of the first quarter – After three consecutive years of outperformance by technology and growth-style stocks, market leadership has broadened in the first quarter of 2026. Year-to-date, the energy sector has been the top performer, rising more than 35%. Industrials, materials, utilities, and consumer staples have also posted gains of more than 5%. Meanwhile, technology, communication services, and consumer discretionary have been among the laggards, each declining more than 5%. From a style perspective, the Russell 1000 Value Index has gained more than 2% this year, while the Russell 1000 Growth Index has declined by roughly 9%. Despite this year’s underperformance, earnings growth expectations for growth stocks remain strong, with estimates calling for earnings growth of more than 20% in 2026, supported by robust anticipated growth in the technology sector. In our view, diversification will be critical for investors over the remainder of the year. We recommend maintaining balance between growth and value stocks. We also favor the industrials and consumer discretionary sectors, offset by underweight positions in consumer staples and utilities as part of our opportunistic equity sector guidance.

Mona Mahajan ;
Investment Strategy

Source for all data: FactSet. 

Investment Policy Committee

The Investment Policy Committee (IPC) defines and upholds Edward Jones investment philosophy, which is grounded in the principles of quality, diversification and a long-term focus.

The IPC meets regularly to talk about the markets, the economy and the current environment, propose new policies and review existing guidance — all with your financial needs at the center.

The IPC members — experts in economics, market strategy, asset allocation and financial solutions — each bring a unique perspective to developing recommendations that can help you achieve your financial goals.

Learn More

Important information:

This is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as specific investment advice. Investors should make investment decisions based on their unique investment objectives and financial situation. While the information is believed to be accurate, it is not guaranteed and is subject to change without notice.

Investors should understand the risks involved in owning investments, including interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk. The value of investments fluctuates and investors can lose some or all of their principal.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Market indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly and are not meant to depict an actual investment.

Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against loss.

Systematic investing does not guarantee a profit or protect against loss. Investors should consider their willingness to keep investing when share prices are declining.

Dividends may be increased, decreased or eliminated at any time without notice.

Special risks are inherent in international investing, including those related to currency fluctuations and foreign political and economic events.