Monthly fixed-income focus
U.S. election results hold implications for fixed income
What you need to know
- Post-election, key policy priorities have emerged: income tax cuts, tariffs, deregulation and immigration reform.
- Extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and deregulation are likely to boost economic growth and corporate profits, contributing to a steeper yield curve and tighter credit spreads.
- Tariffs could raise import prices, while immigration reform could drive labor costs higher if labor markets tighten, driving inflation expectations higher.
- Tax cuts generally reduce government revenues, which, if not offset by economic growth or spending cuts, could drive deficits and debt higher.
Portfolio tip
Consider extending duration with intermediate-term bonds and bond funds to help lock in higher yields for longer. Intermediate-term bonds should be less sensitive than long-term bonds to the risk of yields rising further. Bond prices typically rise in value when interest rates fall, and vice versa, providing the opportunity for higher values as the Fed likely continues cutting rates.
Growth expectations have narrowed credit spreads
Tax cuts and deregulation could boost economic growth and corporate profits, providing a favorable environment for lower-quality issuers, including U.S. high-yield bonds. Perceived credit risk in this market has declined as a result. Credit spreads — which reflect the excess yield above U.S. Treasury bonds to compensate for default risk — have tightened well below historical averages.
We suggest underweighting U.S. high-yield bonds as we see little opportunity for credit spreads to narrow further. Potential widening of credit spreads could drive yields higher and bond prices lower.
U.S. high-yield credit spreads — the excess yield above U.S. Treasury securities to compensate for credit risk — have tightened in recent months.
U.S. high-yield credit spreads — the excess yield above U.S. Treasury securities to compensate for credit risk — have tightened in recent months.
Policy shifts have raised inflation expectations
Proposed tariff hikes, if enacted, could drive prices of imported products higher. The impact on overall inflation, however, may be muted as imports represent about 14% of the U.S. economy, as measured by gross domestic product (GDP). In addition, producers may not be able to fully pass along tariffs to consumers due to competition. Consumers and businesses can typically switch products to limit the impact of higher prices.
Immigration reform, including the proposed deportation of unauthorized workers, could reduce worker availability. If the labor markets tighten, labor costs could rise.
Partially offsetting these effects, less immigration would likely reduce consumption and housing demand, potentially easing inflation. Overall, bond market inflation expectations have risen but remain within the recent range and do not point to a return to elevated inflation.
Bond market inflation expectations — the difference between 10-year Treasury note and 10-year Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) yields — have risen.
Bond market inflation expectations — the difference between 10-year Treasury note and 10-year Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) yields — have risen.
Bond markets have reduced Fed interest rate cut expectations
Higher inflation would likely limit the Federal Reserve’s ability to cut interest rates while still aiming for its 2% inflation target. The federal funds rate typically needs to be more than 1% above inflation for monetary policy to be considered restrictive.
Additionally, stronger growth could spur hiring, which, combined with potentially fewer available workers due to immigration reform, could tighten labor markets. This could help the Fed achieve its full employment mandate, reducing the need for rate cuts to support the labor market. Bond markets have reduced Fed rate cut expectations as a result.
The market-implied federal funds rate at the end of 2025 reflects expectations for fewer Fed interest rate cuts.
The market-implied federal funds rate at the end of 2025 reflects expectations for fewer Fed interest rate cuts.
Tax cuts could lead to larger government deficits
Tax cuts generally reduce government revenues, which, if not offset by economic growth or spending cuts, would widen deficits. Because deficits lead to higher debt over time, long-term bonds are typically perceived to be riskier because government debt levels will be higher when these bonds mature. Concerns over rising deficits and debt can drive long-term bond yields higher to compensate for this risk, steepening the yield curve.
The proposed extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would likely maintain income tax rates near current levels beyond 2025. However, any reduction could negatively impact the value of the tax-exempt income of municipal bonds.
The U.S. Treasury yield curve — the difference between 10-year Treasury and 2-year Treasury note yields — has steepened recently.
The U.S. Treasury yield curve — the difference between 10-year Treasury and 2-year Treasury note yields — has steepened recently.
Brian Therien
Senior Analyst, Investment Strategy
CFA®
Brian Therien
Senior Analyst, Investment Strategy
CFA®
Important information:
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as specific investment advice. Investors should make investment decisions based on their unique investment objectives and financial situation.
Past performance of the markets is not a guarantee of future results.
Before investing in bonds, you should understand the risks involved, including credit risk and market risk. Bond investments are also subject to interest rate risk such that when interest rates rise, the prices of bonds can decrease, and the investor can lose principal value if the investment is sold prior to maturity.